Unverified

Can you identify this sighting?

Unverified at suppressed - suppressed
Unverified at suppressed - suppressed
Unverified at suppressed - suppressed
Unverified at suppressed - suppressed
Unverified at suppressed - suppressed
Request use of media

Identification history

Callitris baileyi 3 Jun 2025 JasonPStewartNMsnc2016
Unverified 22 Apr 2025 MazzV

Identify this sighting


Please Login or Register to identify this sighting.

User's notes

The parent tree of these King William Pines was planted here about 40 years ago, and its long-dead trunk & limbs are still standing (photo 1, far RHS). Photo 1 shows the oldest specimen now growing, as well as a younger one leaning into it on the RHS of the photo. Photo 2 focuses on the canopy, and photo 3 on part of the very upper trunk and seed cones. This tree has both rough furrowed and dark bark on its trunk and oldest branches (photo 4), but smooth, lighter coloured and partly mottled bark on younger specimens’ trunks (photo 3). Photo 4 shows the rough barked mid trunk section of the oldest tree with younger smoother and lighter coloured branches emanating from it. Photo 5 is of a much younger specimen in an attempt to get some clarity on the leaves. All are growing in poor sandy soil and get full sun most of the day in Summer.

5 comments

Csteele4 wrote:
   25 May 2025
The foliage you've shown here does not match that of a King Billy Pine - it looks more like a Callitris. Are you sure the photos are all of the same species? If so, these are not King Billy Pines (Arthrotaxis selaginoides).
MazzV wrote:
   3 Jun 2025
Thanks for that info & suggestion @CSteele, I'll check it out more closely, when I can get back there, with Callitris & consistency between them in mind. Anything I should particularly focus on that might be more useful?
   3 Jun 2025
In the fifth photograph we can see the leaves quite well enough for partial identification,
according to the Flora of NSW online PlantNet botanical key of:

Note, these fresh leaves shown in photograph 5 appear acutely angled in would be cross section and
the keels shown on each leaves' dorsal surface appear acutely keeled.

Please clarify whether or not,
these fresh leaves really do have cross sections acutely angled ?
[and]
the keels shown on each leaves' dorsal surface have acute keels ?

• _Callitris baileyi_ – i suggest based on other features shown here such as the white (glaucous) smaller branches.
[or]
• does not really look like _Callitris macleayana_ and the cones do not fit.
.

The cones, how long ?
• < 15mm ?
[or]
• > 15 mm ?

Ref': https://plantnet.rbgsyd.nsw.gov.au/cgi-bin/NSWfl.pl?page=nswfl&lvl=gn&name=Callitris
.
MazzV wrote:
   15 Jun 2025
Thanks for this info, & questions to follow-up @JasonPStewartNMsnc2016. As with @Csteele4, I will get back to you once I get back to the site. Hopefully this week, didn't make it when I last thought I would. Cheers, MazzV
   15 Jun 2025
Yeah all the best !

Please Login or Register to comment.

Sighting information

Additional information

  • Greater than 5 metres Plant height
  • True Planted

Record quality

  • Images or audio
  • More than one media file
  • Verified by an expert moderator
  • Nearby sighting(s) of same species
  • GPS evidence of location
  • Description
  • Additional attributes
829,073 sightings of 22,788 species from 14,331 members
CCA 3.0 | privacy
NatureMapr is developed by at3am IT Pty Ltd and is proudly Australian made